In December 2026, we plan to publish new Crossref Member Practices which will set out the standards we expect all Crossref members to meet. From August to October 2026 we are consulting with our members on a draft of these Member Practices. This blog provides the background to this, and explains how you can share your views.
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://www.crossref.org/blog/share-your-feedback-on-the-new-crossref-member-practices/
Share your feedback on the draft Member Practices
We invite you to read the draft Member Practices and share your feedback with us. We are keen to understand from our members whether these practices feel realistic and achievable, whether they exclude any part of the community, and if there is anything missing that needs to be included in the Member Practices. As you read the Member Practices, we encourage you to consider:
- Are the outlined Member Practices in line with your expectations of standard best publishing practices? Is there anything that surprised you?
- Do the outlined Crossref Member Practices feel realistic and achievable? Are there any barriers to fulfilling them?
- Are there any behaviours that have been discouraged in the Member Practices but are considered a standard practice in your community?
- Is there anything missing that you would like to see included in the Member Practices?
- Do you need any more information or guidance that would help you in fulfilling any of the Member Practices?
Share below your thoughts on these questions or any other feedback that you may have!