Fixing metadata after a publisher goes missing

Hi,

I am new to this community, and I am not sure if I chose this category correctly.
If I have chosen the wrong category, I would appreciate you pointing it out.

I would like to ask the following question regarding the authority to change metadata associated with a DOI.
A publisher of an academic journal that used publish various articles went bankrupt in the spring of 2022 and gone.
I am one of the authors of articles published in a journal by this publisher.
The website that the publisher used to operate has disappeared, along with its internet domain.
Consequently, the website cannot be traced from the DOIs that were associated with it.
For example, one of the specific DOIs of an article on the journal is as follows:

10.5047/meep.2019.00701.0001

When I try to retrieve the metadata associated with this DOI using curl -iL, I eventually get the following:

HTTP/2 302
date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 14:01:14 GMT
:

curl: (6) Could not resolve host: www.terrapub.co.jp

As shown above, “Could not resolve host: www.terrapub.co.jp” is returned because the domain www.terrapub.co.jp has disappeared, as has the publisher itself.

This publisher ceased to exist without legal procedures, and there is no contact with any of its executives or employees.
According to the laws of our country (Japan), all copyrights are considered to have been returned to the authors under the circumstances.
Fortunately, the journal that includes the above article (called “Monographs on Environmental and Earth and Planets”) was intended to publish just a few but long monographs per year.
And, only 11 articles had been published in total since its volume 1.
With the help of the editorial board members, I contacted all of these authors.
As a result, PDF files of all the 11 articles were recovered (whose DOIs are all disconnected from the article resources as above).
The article files are now placed under a repository of a public organization, albeit temporarily.

Here is my question:
As mentioned above, no one is able to contact this publisher now, and will remain so.
But, some of the editorial board members of this journal are still active.
The editorial board and the authors, including me, strongly hope to change the metadata of the original DOI, and link it to new website.
This way, readers would be able to reach our articles through the original DOI.
Currently, as mentioned above, tracing back to the original DOI ends up with a “Not Found” message.
Who should be in charge of (or be authorized for) such metadata modification?
I know that the original publisher should be the one to do it.
But now that they have disappeared, is it correct to understand that the authority has been transferred to the editorial office?
Or, is there a legal procedure that should be followed in proceeding with a series of things?
I would like to know the specific procedures to be followed in such a case.

I understand that such an instance is rare or unique.
But we are still hopeful that the DOI metadata will be rewritten to be correct.
Thank you very much in advance.

Best regards,
Takashi

1 Like

Hi Takashi, thank you for your message and welcome to the Crossref community forum.

The publisher of the prefix 10.5047 has been inactive since the year 2022. Therefore, in such a case where all of those DOIs are resolving to an error page, we should be able able to assist you make the resolution URL update.

To enable this, please share with us the current permanent resolution URLs for all those DOIs that were published by the member. You can find a list of all the registered DOIs here https://data.crossref.org/depositorreport?pubid=J107585

Please share what you have with regards to the current resolution URLs, and we will make the updates after performing some verifications of them on our end.

Evans

Tech Support Specialist - Crossref

1 Like

@eatoni

Hi Evans,

Thank you very much for your quick response.

I appreciate it very much.

Yes, I will collect necessary information and get back to you within several days.

Please wait for a while.

About the series of DOIs that begins with 10.5047 which are no longer able to communicate such as what you listed, I do not know the current status related to other journals than 10.5047/meep.* .

However, some of my colleagues may know about it, so I will try to gather information as well and get it to you.

Thanks again for your support and help,

Best regards,

Takashi

1 Like

@eatoni

Hi Evans,

Please accept my apologies for the delay.
Below you will find the list of the current (live) URLs that correspond to each of the broken DOIs.
This journal publishes long monographs, so the following eleven are all for the entire journal:

  • 10.5047/meep.2012.00101.0001 –>

http://www.nhao.jp/research/meep/abstract/01/0101.html

  • 10.5047/meep.2012.00102.0071 –>

http://www.nhao.jp/research/meep/abstract/01/0102.html

  • 10.5047/meep.2012.00103.0121 –>

http://www.nhao.jp/research/meep/abstract/01/0103.html

  • 10.5047/meep.2014.00201.0001 –>

http://www.nhao.jp/research/meep/abstract/02/0201.html

  • 10.5047/meep.2014.00202.0023 –>

http://www.nhao.jp/research/meep/abstract/02/0202.html

  • 10.5047/meep.2015.00301.0001 –>

http://www.nhao.jp/research/meep/abstract/03/0301.html

  • 10.5047/meep.2016.00401.0001 –>

http://www.nhao.jp/research/meep/abstract/04/0401.html

  • 10.5047/meep.2017.00501.0001 –>

http://www.nhao.jp/research/meep/abstract/05/0501.html

  • 10.5047/meep.2017.00502.0035 –>

http://www.nhao.jp/research/meep/abstract/05/0502.html

  • 10.5047/meep.2018.00601.0001 –>

http://www.nhao.jp/research/meep/abstract/06/0601.html

  • 10.5047/meep.2019.00701.0001 –>

http://www.nhao.jp/research/meep/abstract/07/0701.html

Here, I would like to make two caveats for you.
The first is that, as I wrote above, these URLs are still the normal http and not yet https (secure).
The website administrator is aware that this is not desirable.
The second caveat is related to this.
Over the next half year or so, the above URLs are scheduled to undergo some minor changes, including their conversion from http to https.
This means that even if I ask you to change the URLs associated with these eleven DOIs now, I will likely ask you to do it again in the next few months or so.

Would such a request be acceptable for you?
Or, should I make another request to you after the URL changes are completed a several months from now?

I personally would like to register the current URL as soon as possible, and to resolve the invalid status of the DOIs at the earliest opportunity.
But of course, we must leave these matters to your discretion.
I hope you will take the most efficient steps for your organization.

Thank you very much again.

Best regards,
Takashi

1 Like

Hello @tito ,

Thanks for providing those updated resolution URLs to us. @eatoni successfully updated those URLs earlier today, as you can see here: https://doi.org/10.5047/meep.2012.00101.0001. All of the DOIs should now be resolving.

That’s much better than the error messages that these DOIs were previously resolving to:

Thank you!

The first is that, as I wrote above, these URLs are still the normal http and not yet https (secure).
The website administrator is aware that this is not desirable.
The second caveat is related to this.
Over the next half year or so, the above URLs are scheduled to undergo some minor changes, including their conversion from http to https.
This means that even if I ask you to change the URLs associated with these eleven DOIs now, I will likely ask you to do it again in the next few months or so.

Would such a request be acceptable for you?
Or, should I make another request to you after the URL changes are completed a several months from now?

We’d prefer that the DOIs resolve to URLs beginning with https, but updating the metadata so the DOI links resolve to the actual content is a much higher priority than https over http. When you have https links for these DOIs, let us know.

Thanks again,

Isaac

1 Like

@ifarley

Hi Isaac,

Wow, it is really great, thank you very much!!
This finally frees the authors from the frustration they have had for years.
I really appreciate your help.

When you have https links for these DOIs, let us know.

Yes, I will make sure to do that.
When exactly that change will take place is yet to be determined, but I am certain it will be done within the next several months.
When that happens, I will again ask you to make the metadata changes.
I apologize for the inconvenience, but I would be happy to have you handle the changes.

Thank you very much again.

Best regards,
Takashi

Of course @tito . We appreciate your help. We’ll be happy to update those resolution URLs to use HTTPS when they are available. Just write us again on this thread.

Have a lovely day,

Isaac